Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12955188›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2003

Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine.

Gordon Stuart Doig, Fiona Simpson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biocuration with insufficient resources and fixed timelines.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  10. Is intramedullary nailing more effective than non-operative treatment in adults with displaced middle-third clavicle fractures?Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Optimal strategies for literature search.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2009
    Article
  16. Evidence-based resources simplified.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  17. Renal blood flow in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2005
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gordon Stuart DoigIntensive Therapy Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, 2065, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia. gdoig@med.usyd.edu.au.
Fiona SimpsonDepartment of Nutrition, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficient literature searching and the application of formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature are the two key skills defining the practice of evidence-based medicine. Although clinicians embrace the concepts of evidence-based medicine, most identify limited personal time as the major barrier towards its implementation into daily practice. Busy clinicians who practice evidence-based medicine identify systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as very useful resources.

methodsThis review presents a simple, easy-to-follow, three-step searching strategy that emphasises the use of powerful new PubMed features that allow clinicians to retrieve high-quality systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and primary studies with a single mouse click. The overall effectiveness of the process is further improved by highlighting the major features of successful and unsuccessful literature searches.

conclusionsAt the end of this tutorial the reader should be able to conduct efficient and effective literature searches that support clinical decision making in under 10 minutes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEvidence-Based MedicinePubMedHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.