Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12952064›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2002

Dictyostelium discoideum adhesion and motility under shear flow: experimental and theoretical approaches.

Franz Bruckert, Emmanuel Décavé, Daniel Garrivier, Pierre Cosson, Yves Bréchet, Bertrand Fourcade, Michel Satre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Franz BruckertLaboratoire de Biochimie et Biophysique des Systèmes Intégrés (UMR 5092), Département Réponse et Dynamique Cellulaires, CEA-Grenoble, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 09, France. fbruckert@cea.fr
Emmanuel Décavé
Daniel Garrivier
Pierre Cosson
Yves Bréchet
Bertrand Fourcade
Michel Satre
CEA Grenoble · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRLaboratoire d’Electrochimie et de Physico-chimie des Matériaux et des Interfaces · FRUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the different assays to measure cell adhesion, shear-flow detachment chambers offer the advantage to study both passive and active aspects of the phenomena on large cell numbers. Mathematical modeling allows full exploitation of the data by relating molecular parameters to cell mechanics. Using D. discoideum as a model system, we explain how cell detachment kinetics gives access to the rate constants describing the passive association or dissociation of the cell membrane to a given substrate.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell AdhesionCell MembraneCell MovementDictyosteliumModels, BiologicalMutagenesisStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID12952064
OpenAlexW2187749658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.