Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12947388›Full record

ReviewOncogene2003

Transcription factors activated in mammalian cells after clinically relevant doses of ionizing radiation.

Tracy Criswell, Konstantin Leskov, Shigeki Miyamoto, Guangbin Luo, David A Boothman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Radiation in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology research · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Is pain part of a systemic syndrome in head and neck cancer?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy CriswellDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Program in Molecular Basis of Disease, Laboratory of Molecular Stress Responses, Ireland Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, OH 44106-4942, USA.
Konstantin Leskov
Shigeki Miyamoto
Guangbin Luo
David A Boothman
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Regulation of NEMO modifications in radiation-induced NF-kB signalingR01CA077474 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MIYAMOTO, SHIGEKI · 2000 to 2014
$4.0M
DNA MISMATCH REPAIR IN FDURD INDUCED CYTOTOXICITYR01CA083196 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTHMAN, DAVID A · 1999 to 2002
$617k
XIP8, AN X RAY INDUCIBLE KU70 BINDING PROTEINR01CA078530 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BOOTHMAN, DAVID A · 1998 to 2001
$433k
NCI NIH HHS CA-77474-03NCI NIH HHS CA-83196-05NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, a wealth of information has been published on transcripts and proteins 'induced' (requiring new protein synthesis) in mammalian cells after ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. Many of these studies have also attempted to elucidate the transcription factors that are 'activated' (i.e., not requiring de novo synthesis) in specific cells by IR. Unfortunately, all too often this information has been obtained using supralethal doses of IR, with investigators assuming that induction of these proteins, or activation of corresponding transcription factors, can be 'extrapolated' to low-dose IR exposures. This review focuses on what is known at the molecular level about transcription factors induced at clinically relevant (< or =2 Gy) doses of IR. A review of the literature demonstrates that extrapolation from high doses of IR to low doses of IR is inaccurate for most transcription factors and most IR-inducible transcripts/proteins, and that induction of transactivating proteins at low doses must be empirically derived. The signal transduction pathways stimulated after high versus low doses of IR, which act to transactivate certain transcription factors in the cell, will be discussed. To date, only three transcription factors appear to be responsive (i.e. activated) after physiological doses (doses wherein cells survive or recover) of IR. These are p53, nuclear factor kappa B(NF-kappaB), and the SP1-related retinoblastoma control proteins (RCPs). Clearly, more information on transcription factors and proteins induced in mammalian cells at clinically or environmentally relevant doses of IR is needed to understand the role of these stress responses in cancer susceptibility/resistance and radio-sensitivity/resistance mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA DamageHumansNeoplasmsNF-kappa BPromoter Regions, GeneticRadiation, IonizingTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53NF-kappa BTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID12947388
OpenAlexW2047447041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.