Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12947386›Full record

ReviewOncogene2003

Roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in homologous recombination, DNA replication fidelity and the cellular response to ionizing radiation.

Simon N Powell, Lisa A Kachnic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 147 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 356 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multiomics analyses revealScience advances · 2023
    Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. SNPowell@Partners.Org
Lisa A Kachnic
Boston University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inheritance of one defective copy of either of the two breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, predisposes individuals to breast and ovarian cancers. Current progress in determining the function of these genes suggests that they participate in a common pathway to facilitate orderly homologous recombination and thereby maintain genomic integrity. As a consequence of this defect in homologous recombination, tumors that arise in BRCA carriers are likely to be more sensitive to ionizing radiation. This review summarizes recent investigations about the nature of the defect in DNA repair, and highlights the unanswered questions about the tumor suppressor paradox of BRCA genes. The unsolved mystery is the other genetic changes that must occur to turn a BRCA-deficient cell from a nonviable cell into a tumor cell capable of endless growth.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2ApoptosisDNA ReplicationHumansNeoplasmsRadiation, IonizingRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID12947386
OpenAlexW2115808409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.