ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003
General practitioners with special clinical interests.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Economic evaluation of a general practitioner with special interests led dermatology service in primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Trial
- Family medicine practice and research: survey of physicians' attitudes towards scientific research in a post-communist transition country.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2007Article
- General practitioners with a special interest in respiratory medicine: national survey of UK primary care organisations.BMC health services research · 2005Article
- General practitioners with special clinical interests: experience has been successful.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- General practitioners with special clinical interests: evidence for effectiveness exists.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- Subspecialization in Family Medicine: Opinions, Preferences, and Practices of Family Physicians in Saudi Arabia.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.