Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12944510›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2003

Novel insights into the regulation of the timeless protein.

Lesley J Ashmore, Sriram Sathyanarayanan, David W Silvestre, Mark M Emerson, Peter Schotland, Amita Sehgal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Post-Translational Modifications in Animal Circadian Clocks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NewFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Post-translational regulation and nuclear entry of TIMELESS and PERIOD are affected in new timeless mutant.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Two distinct modes of PERIOD recruitment onto dCLOCK reveal a novel role for TIMELESS in circadian transcription.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lesley J AshmoreHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Medical School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Sriram Sathyanarayanan
David W Silvestre
Mark M Emerson
Peter Schotland
Amita Sehgal
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Drosophila circadian clock, period (per) and its partner, timeless (tim), play a central role in the negative limb of an autoregulatory feedback loop. Unlike per, the dosage of which affects the frequency (tau) of the circadian cycle, we found that increasing copies of the tim gene has no effect on clock period length. The use of the tim promoter to express per results in a shortening of circadian period, also indicating that the regulation of tim is different from that of per. Drosophila TIM is similar to the mammalian circadian protein mPER2 in that it shuttles independently between the nucleus and cytoplasm both in vivo and in vitro. Contrary to the current model that PER and TIM heterodimerization is a prerequisite for their nuclear entry, PER is not required to transport TIM into nuclei, although it influences TIM localization and vice versa. Blocking nuclear export led to increased nuclear expression of TIM in S2 cells and in wild-type and per01 larvae, suggesting that PER may be required for nuclear retention of TIM. Unlike PER, nuclear TIM alone has no ability to repress transcription. We propose that TIM drives cycles of PER expression by regulating its stability, and in turn, PER retains TIM in the nucleus, either for the regulation of its own stability or for a novel nuclear role of TIM.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsARNTL Transcription FactorsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell LineCell NucleusCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene DosageGene Expression RegulationNeuronsNuclear ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsARNTL Transcription FactorsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsClk protein, DrosophilaCLOCK Proteinscyc protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, Drosophilatim protein, DrosophilaTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID12944510
PMCPMC6740606
OpenAlexW2113578944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.