ReviewBone marrow transplantation2003
Transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: yes, no, maybe so. . . An Oregon perspective.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of pediatric patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2010Article
- Evaluation of early hospital discharge after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2007Article
- A novel triple purge strategy for eliminating chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells from autografts.Bone marrow transplantation · 2006Article
- Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance.Leukemia · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic stem cell disorder in which allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option, but its use is limited by donor availability and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent for CML with efficacy to date, which is superior to all other nontransplant therapy and has limited toxicity. The curative potential of imatinib remains to be proven and may be limited to a small number of patients. Optimal decision making regarding the use of these divergent therapies has not been defined. This paper reviews critical data relevant to these treatment options and provides an approach to current management of the CML patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12942091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.