Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12939169›Full record

Trial reportBMC cardiovascular disorders2003

Protocol for Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged study (BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial of warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in the management of atrial fibrillation in an elderly primary care population [ISRCTN89345269].

Jonathan W F Mant, Suzanne H Richards, F D Richard Hobbs, David Fitzmaurice, Gregory Y H Lip, Ellen Murray, Miriam Banting, Kate Fletcher, Joy Rahman, Teresa Allan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The safety and adequacy of antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: a regional cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan W F MantDepartment of Primary Care & General Practice, University of Birmingham, UK. j.w.mant@bham.ac.uk
Suzanne H Richards
F D Richard Hobbs
David Fitzmaurice
Gregory Y H Lip
Ellen Murray
Miriam Banting
Kate Fletcher
Joy Rahman
Teresa Allan
James Raftery
Stirling Bryan
Midlands Research Consortium of General Practice
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is an important independent risk factor for stroke. Randomised controlled trials have shown that this risk can be reduced substantially by treatment with warfarin or more modestly by treatment with aspirin. Existing trial data for the effectiveness of warfarin are drawn largely from studies in selected secondary care populations that under-represent the elderly. The Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged (BAFTA) study will provide evidence of the risks and benefits of warfarin versus aspirin for the prevention of stroke for older people with AF in a primary care setting. STUDY

designA randomised controlled trial where older patients with AF are randomised to receive adjusted dose warfarin or aspirin. Patients will be followed up at three months post-randomisation, then at six monthly intervals there after for an average of three years by their general practitioner. Patients will also receive an annual health questionnaire.1240 patients will be recruited from over 200 practices in England. Patients must be aged 75 years or over and have AF. Patients will be excluded if they have a history of any of the following conditions: rheumatic heart disease; major non-traumatic haemorrhage; intra-cranial haemorrhage; oesophageal varices; active endoscopically proven peptic ulcer disease; allergic hypersensitivity to warfarin or aspirin; or terminal illness. Patients will also be excluded if the GP considers that there are clinical reasons to treat a patient with warfarin in preference to aspirin (or vice versa). The primary end-point is fatal or non-fatal disabling stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or significant arterial embolism. Secondary outcomes include major extra-cranial haemorrhage, death (all cause, vascular), hospital admissions (all cause, vascular), cognition, quality of life, disability and compliance with study medication.

Indexed as

AgedAnticoagulantsAspirinAtrial FibrillationHumansIncidenceInternational Normalized RatioMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SelectionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeStrokeWarfarinAnticoagulantsAspirinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID12939169
PMCPMC201020
OpenAlexW2142415817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.