ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry1992
Menadione-resistant Chinese hamster cell variants are cross-resistant to hydrogen peroxide and exhibit stable chromosomal and biochemical alterations.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Free radical theory of autoimmunity.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2006Review
- Expression of human NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase (DT-diaphorase) in Chinese hamster ovary cells: effect on the toxicity of antitumor quinones.Molecular pharmacology · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have investigated the antioxidant properties of V79 Chinese hamster cells rendered resistant to menadione by chronic exposure to increasing concentrations of this quinone. MD1, a clone of resistant cells, was compared to the parental M8 cells; the former showed increased activity of catalase (3 fold), glutathione peroxidase (1.6 fold) and DT-diaphorase (2.6 fold), as well as an increase in glutathione (3.2 fold). Although one of the products of menadione metabolism is superoxide anion, no changes in total superoxide dismutase activity was observed in MD1 cells. MD1 menadione resistant cells were also resistant to killing by hydrogen peroxide and contained tandem duplication of chromosome 6. A similar duplication of chromosome 6 was seen in several independently derived menadione resistant clones and therefore seems closed linked to the establishment of the resistance. Upon removal of menadione from the medium, some of these properties of MD1 cells, viz., resistance to menadione, elevated glutathione levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity, were lost and the cells resembled M8 cells. However, resistance to H2O2, elevated catalase activity and the duplicated chromosome remained stable for more than 40 cell passages in the absence of menadione. The increase in catalase activity was correlated with an increase in catalase mRNA content and a 50% amplification of catalase gene, as determined, respectively, by Northern and Southern blot analysis. The role of the chromosome 6 duplication in resistance to oxidative stress remains to be established. It is not responsible directly for elevated catalase levels since the catalase gene is on chromosome 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.