ArticleGenetics2003
High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci by selective recombinant genotyping.
Article in Genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Recombinant Progeny: a design for ultra-high resolution mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci in crosses between inbred or pure lines.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Combining DNA pooling with selective recombinant genotyping for increased efficiency in fine mapping.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2010Article
- Article
- Fractioned DNA pooling: a new cost-effective strategy for fine mapping of quantitative trait loci.Genetics · 2007Article
- Article
- High-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping reveals sign epistasis controlling ovariole number between two Drosophila species.Genetics · 2006Article
- Improving quantitative trait loci mapping resolution in experimental crosses by the use of genotypically selected samples.Genetics · 2005Article
- Article
- Mapping modifiers affecting muscularity of the myostatin mutant (Mstn(Cmpt-dl1Abc)) compact mouse.Genetics · 2003Article
- Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective recombinant genotyping (SRG) is a three-stage procedure for high-resolution mapping of a QTL that has previously been mapped to a known confidence interval (target C.I.). In stage 1, a large mapping population is accessed and phenotyped, and a proportion, P, of the high and low tails is selected. In stage 2, the selected individuals are genotyped for a pair of markers flanking the target C.I., and a group of R individuals carrying recombinant chromosomes in the target interval are identified. In stage 3, the recombinant individuals are genotyped for a set of M markers spanning the target C.I. Extensive simulations showed that: (1) Standard error of QTL location (SEQTL) decreased when QTL effect (d) or population size (N) increased, but was constant for given "power factor" (PF = d(2)N); (2) increasing the proportion selected in the tails beyond 0.25 had only a negligible effect on SEQTL; and (3) marker spacing in the target interval had a remarkably powerful effect on SEQTL, yielding a reduction of up to 10-fold in going from highest (24 cM) to lowest (0.29 cM) spacing at given population size and QTL effect. At the densest marker spacing, SEQTL of 1.0-0.06 cM were obtained at PF = 500-16,000. Two new genotyping procedures, the half-section algorithm and the golden section/half-section algorithm, allow the equivalent of complete haplotyping of the target C.I. in the recombinant individuals to be achieved with many fewer data points than would be required by complete individual genotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.