Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12930353›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2003

Bacterial superantigens.

T Proft, J D Fraser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Immune Checkpoint Molecules as Biomarkers ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mechanisms of vascular damage in ANCA vasculitis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. The molecular characterization of antibody binding to a superantigen-like protein from a commensal microbe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T ProftSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland New Zealand.
J D Fraser

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesBinding SitesDisease SusceptibilityEnterotoxinsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansLymphocyte ActivationMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMammary Tumor Virus, MouseMiceMucocutaneous Lymph Node SyndromeReceptors, Antigen, T-CellRheumatic FeverShock, SepticStaphylococcal Food PoisoningEnterotoxinsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSuperantigens

Identifiers

PMID12930353
PMCPMC1808794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.