Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12930107›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2003

Developing priority criteria for hip and knee replacement: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project.

Gordon Arnett, David C Hadorn, Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient Perceptions of COVID-19-Related Surgical Delay: An Analysis of Patients Awaiting Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Factors and consequences of waiting times for total hip arthroplasty.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011
    Article
  13. Waiting for surgery from the patient perspective.Psychology research and behavior management · 2009
    Article
  14. Willingness of patients to change surgeons for a shorter waiting time for joint arthroplasty.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A bird can't fly on one wing: patient views on waiting for hip and knee replacement surgery.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007
    Article
  19. Predicting joint replacement waiting times.Health care management science · 2007
    Review
  20. The wait for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gordon ArnettWestern Canada Waiting List Project Hip and Knee Replacement Panel, Edmonton, Alta.
David C Hadorn
Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Western Canada Waiting List Project (WCWL), a federally funded partnership of 19 organizations, was created to develop tools for managing waiting lists. The WCWL panel on hip and knee replacement surgery was 1 of 5 panels constituted under this project.

methodsThe panel developed and tested a collection of standardized clinical criteria for setting priorities among patients awaiting hip and knee replacement. The criteria were applied to 405 patients in 4 provinces. Regression analysis was used to determine the set of criteria weights that collectively best predicted clinicians' overall urgency ratings. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was assessed from 6 videotaped patient interviews, scored by orthopedic surgeons, related professionals and general practitioners.

resultsThe priority criteria accounted for over two-thirds of the observed variance in overall urgency ratings (adjusted R2 = 0.676). The panel modified the criteria and weights based on the empirical findings and on clinical judgement. The reliability of the priority criteria for the hip and knee replacement tool was among the strongest of the 5 instruments developed in the WCWL project.

conclusionsThe panel considered the criteria easy to use and reasonably reflective of expert surgical judgement regarding clinical urgency for hip and knee replacement. Further development and testing of the tool appears warranted.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeWaiting ListsCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID12930107
PMCPMC3211637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.