Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12919172›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003

The clinical pharmacology of ageing.

C G Swift

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Potentially inappropriate medications among elderly Brazilian outpatients.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2013
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C G SwiftDepartment of Health Care of the Elderly, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College Hospital (Dulwich), East Dulwich Grove, London SE22 8PT, UK. cameron.swift@kcl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ageing of populations and individuals continues to be as vital, yet to some extent as neglected, a topic in pharmacology and therapeutics as was first realised about 30 years ago. In parallel with the realisation of the predicted demographic shifts in both the developed and developing world, there have since been major developments in the basic biological concepts of ageing, in the physiology of ageing, in the study of pathogenetic mechanisms underlying a variety of age-associated disorders and syndromes, and in the evidence base for therapeutic intervention in elderly patient populations. These all present new challenges both in the practical delivery of effective medical care and in clinical and biological research. The scale of prescribing for an ageing population has continued to rise as anticipated. Whether there has now been any improvement in the quality or rationality of prescribing, or in the previously demonstrated unacceptable level of susceptibility to adverse drug reactions in the (now expanded) older patient population is largely unknown. We urgently need to find out using up-to-date research methods. National and international guidelines for drug development and regulation have more recently been followed by broader policy initiatives on prescribing for older people, but the impact of these on standards of medication use and on clinical outcome remains to be seen. A new series in this journal on the clinical pharmacology of ageing is timely. The required focus and framework for research have often tended in the past to emerge as afterthoughts behind the merely disease specific, and it is to be hoped that a sequential review of some of the key topics may help to re-ignite a more sound and less short-sighted agenda than previously.

Indexed as

AgingClinical Trials as TopicDrug PrescriptionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PolicyHumansMedical AuditPharmacology, ClinicalPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID12919172
PMCPMC1884344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.