Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12918091›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2003

Modification of bitter taste in children.

Julie A Mennella, M Yanina Pepino, Gary K Beauchamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Genetic influences on diet in young Swedish adults: a twin study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Taste Perceptions of Common Pediatric Antibiotic Suspensions and Associated Prescribing Patterns in Medical Residents.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Optimizing oral medications for children.Clinical therapeutics · 2008
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie A MennellaMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA. mennella@monell.org
M Yanina Pepino
Gary K Beauchamp
Monell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

MODEL FOR SENSITIVE PERIODS IN EARLY FLAVOR LEARNINGR01HD037119 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE · 1999 to 2016
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS HD 37119NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The palatability of oral medications, many of which are quite bitter, plays an important role in achieving compliance in pediatric patients. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of a sodium salt to some, but not all, bitter tasting liquids enhances acceptance and reduces the perceived bitterness in 7- to 10-year-old children and their mothers. For both children and adults, sodium gluconate significantly suppressed the perceived bitterness and enhanced the acceptance of urea and caffeine whereas the reverse was true for another bitter stimulus, Tetralone. Because children preferred salted solutions more than did adults, these data suggest that the use of sodium salts may be an especially effective strategy for reducing the bitterness of some medicines and facilitating compliance among pediatric populations. However, based on sodium's differential ability to inhibit bitterness, as has been shown here with children and adults, clearly each drug of interest must be evaluated separately.

Indexed as

Drug TherapyTasteAdministration, OralChildChoice BehaviorFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID12918091
PMCPMC2799510
OpenAlexW2089276023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.