Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12917972›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Anti-IgE for chronic asthma.

S Walker, M Monteil, K Phelan, T J Lasserson, E H Walters

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Asthma biologics: Comparing trial designs, patient cohorts and study results.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Asthma exacerbations: origin, effect, and prevention.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S WalkerNational Respiratory Training Centre, The Athenaeum, 10 Church Street, Warwick, UK, CV34 4AB.
M Monteil
K Phelan
T J Lasserson
E H Walters
Church of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmalizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody directed against immunoglobulin E (IgE) to inhibit the immune system's response to allergen exposure. Omalizumab is directed against the binding site of IgE for its high affinity Fc receptor. It prevents free serum IgE from attaching to mast cells and other effector cells and prevents IgE mediated inflammatory changes. The complexes of Omalizumab and IgE formed as a result of treatment are small and not thought to be able to trigger complement activation or give rise to immune complex mediated pathology.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of anti-IgE in patients with allergic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma trials register (February 2003) for potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised control trials examining anti-IgE administered in any manner for any duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted and entered data. Three modes of administration were identified from the published literature (inhaled, intravenous and subcutaneous injection). Subgroup analysis was performed by asthma severity. Data were extracted from published and unpublished sources. MAIN

resultsEight trials were included in the review, contributing a total of 2037 mild to severe allergic asthmatic participants with high levels of IgE. Treatment with intravenous and subcutaneous Omalizumab resulted in a 98 to 99% reduction in free IgE, reductions which were not observed following placebo treatment. Significant increases in the number of participants who were able to reduce (> 50% reduction in daily corticosteroid usage (four trials): odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02 to 3.10; or completely withdraw their daily steroid intake (four trials): OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.00 to 3.13, were observed. Participants treated with Omalizumab were less likely to suffer an asthma exacerbation (stable steroid phase (three trials): OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.61; steroid reduction phase (three trials) OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.59). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsOmalizumab was significantly more effective than placebo at increasing the numbers of patients who were able to reduce or withdraw their inhaled steroids and was effective in reducing asthma exacerbations. Omalizumab was well tolerated, although the safety profile requires longer term assessment. Patient and physician assessment of the drug was positive. Further assessment in paediatric and severe adult populations is necessary, as is comparison with inhaled corticosteroids.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaChronic DiseaseHumansImmunoglobulin EOmalizumabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedanti-IgE antibodiesImmunoglobulin EOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID12917972
OpenAlexW1879831300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.