SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Anti-IgE for chronic asthma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Potential of Controlled Delivery Systems in Asthma: Preclinical Development of Flavonoid-Based Treatments.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Therapeutic Effects of an Anti-sialyl Lewis X Antibody in a Murine Model of Allergic Asthma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Asthma biologics: Comparing trial designs, patient cohorts and study results.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020Review
- Economic Impact and Clinical Outcomes of Omalizumab Add-On Therapy for Patients with Severe Persistent Asthma: A Real-World Study.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2019Article
- The use of biologics in children with allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: Current updates.Pediatric investigation · 2019Review
- Asthma exacerbations: origin, effect, and prevention.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOmalizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody directed against immunoglobulin E (IgE) to inhibit the immune system's response to allergen exposure. Omalizumab is directed against the binding site of IgE for its high affinity Fc receptor. It prevents free serum IgE from attaching to mast cells and other effector cells and prevents IgE mediated inflammatory changes. The complexes of Omalizumab and IgE formed as a result of treatment are small and not thought to be able to trigger complement activation or give rise to immune complex mediated pathology.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy of anti-IgE in patients with allergic asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma trials register (February 2003) for potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised control trials examining anti-IgE administered in any manner for any duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted and entered data. Three modes of administration were identified from the published literature (inhaled, intravenous and subcutaneous injection). Subgroup analysis was performed by asthma severity. Data were extracted from published and unpublished sources. MAIN
resultsEight trials were included in the review, contributing a total of 2037 mild to severe allergic asthmatic participants with high levels of IgE. Treatment with intravenous and subcutaneous Omalizumab resulted in a 98 to 99% reduction in free IgE, reductions which were not observed following placebo treatment. Significant increases in the number of participants who were able to reduce (> 50% reduction in daily corticosteroid usage (four trials): odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02 to 3.10; or completely withdraw their daily steroid intake (four trials): OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.00 to 3.13, were observed. Participants treated with Omalizumab were less likely to suffer an asthma exacerbation (stable steroid phase (three trials): OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.61; steroid reduction phase (three trials) OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.59). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsOmalizumab was significantly more effective than placebo at increasing the numbers of patients who were able to reduce or withdraw their inhaled steroids and was effective in reducing asthma exacerbations. Omalizumab was well tolerated, although the safety profile requires longer term assessment. Patient and physician assessment of the drug was positive. Further assessment in paediatric and severe adult populations is necessary, as is comparison with inhaled corticosteroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.