SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antiviral treatment and other therapeutic interventions for herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Ex vivo model of herpes simplex virus type I dendritic and geographic keratitis using a corneal active storage machine.PloS one · 2020Article
- Red Eye: A Guide for Non-specialists.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.BMC medical research methodology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany clinical trials have been performed on the acute treatment of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Surveys of ocular antiviral pharmacology and of herpes simplex virus eye disease have evaluated different interventions, but a systematic review of all comparative clinical studies has not previously been undertaken.
objectivesThe objective of this review is to compare the effects of various treatments for dendritic or geographic herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Sources searched for relevant studies were the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register), (Issue 3 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002), EMBASE (1980 to August 2002), LILACS (up to 2002), Index Medicus (1960 to 1965), Excerpta Medica Ophthalmology (1960 to 1973), reference lists of primary reports and review articles, and conference proceedings pertaining to ocular virology. SELECTION CRITERIA: This review includes comparative clinical trials that assessed one-week and/or two-week healing rates of topical ophthalmic or oral antiviral agents and/or physical or chemical debridement in people with active epithelial keratitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The reviewer extracted data and assessed trial quality. Interventions were compared by the proportions of participants healed at seven days and at fourteen days after trial enrollment. MAIN
resultsThis review includes data from 97 trials that randomised a total of 5102 participants. Compared to idoxuridine, the topical application of vidarabine, trifluridine, or acyclovir generally resulted in a significantly greater proportion of participants healing within one week of treatment. Among these three antiviral agents, no treatment emerged as significantly better for the therapy of dendritic epithelial keratitis. Insufficient placebo-controlled studies were available to assess debridement and other physical or physicochemical methods of treatment. Interferon monotherapy had a slight beneficial effect on dendritic epithelial keratitis, but not better than other antiviral agents, although interferon was very useful combined with debridement or with another antiviral agent such as trifluridine. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsCurrently available antiviral agents are effective and nearly equivalent. The combination of a nucleoside antiviral with either debridement or with interferon seems to speed healing. Future trials of the acute treatment of herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis must aim to achieve adequate statistical power for assessing the primary outcome of epithelial healing and should consider the effect of lesion size and other characteristics on treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12917935What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.