Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12917919›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke.

L Martinsson, N G Wahlgren, H-G Hårdemark

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monoaminergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L MartinssonDepartment of Neurology R2:03, Stroke Research Unit, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, SWEDEN, 171 76.
N G Wahlgren
H-G Hårdemark
Karolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperimental animal research shows that treatment with amphetamines improves recovery after focal cerebral ischaemia. If the effect were similar in humans, amphetamine treatment could have a major impact on recovery from stroke.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of amphetamine treatment in patients with stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched November 2002). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 4 2002), MEDLINE (1966-September 2002), EMBASE (1980-November 2002), and Science Citation Index (1992-December 2002). The reference lists of all relevant articles and reviews were checked, and we contacted researchers in the field to identify further published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized unconfounded trials comparing amphetamine with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN

resultsSeven studies involving 172 patients were included. The quality of the trials varied but was generally high. Based on two trials (85 patients) there was no evidence that amphetamine treatment reduced death or dependence (Peto's odds ratio, [Peto OR] 1.54; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.64 to 3.73). In these two trials, there were imbalances at baseline, with more serious strokes allocated to amphetamine. This imbalance may account for the trend for more deaths at the end of follow-up among amphetamine allocated patients (Peto OR 3.33; 95% CI 0.99 to 11.24). Based on 4 studies (95 patients) there was evidence of a better relative change in motor function according to the Fugl-Meyer motor scale (Weighted Mean Difference, [WMD] -8.17 points; 95% CI -13.58 to -2.76) and based on 1 study (21 patients) there was evidence of a better change in language function as assessed by the Porch Index of Communicative Ability score (WMD -7.51 points; 95% CI -14.42 to -0.60) in amphetamine allocated patients. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAt present, too few patients have been studied to draw any definite conclusions about the effects of amphetamine treatment on recovery from stroke. The suggested benefits on motor and language function, and the non-significant trend towards increased risk of death, could be related to imbalances in prognostic variables or other bias in studies. Further research in this area is therefore justified.

Indexed as

AmphetaminesBrain IschemiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeAmphetamines

Identifiers

PMID12917919
OpenAlexW4254113791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.