SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monoaminergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines.Drugs & aging · 2004Pooled it
- A double blind placebo RCT to investigate the effects of serotonergic modulation on brain excitability and motor recovery in stroke patients.Journal of neurology · 2009Trial
- Levodopa increases memory encoding and dopamine release in the striatum in the elderly.Neurobiology of aging · 2008Trial
- Amphetamine increases blood pressure and heart rate but has no effect on motor recovery or cerebral haemodynamics in ischaemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 36285333).Journal of human hypertension · 2007Trial
- Better language through chemistry: Augmenting speech-language therapy with pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2011Review
- Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2011Review
- Recovery of function in humans: cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments after stroke.Neurobiology of disease · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExperimental animal research shows that treatment with amphetamines improves recovery after focal cerebral ischaemia. If the effect were similar in humans, amphetamine treatment could have a major impact on recovery from stroke.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of amphetamine treatment in patients with stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched November 2002). In addition, we searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 4 2002), MEDLINE (1966-September 2002), EMBASE (1980-November 2002), and Science Citation Index (1992-December 2002). The reference lists of all relevant articles and reviews were checked, and we contacted researchers in the field to identify further published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized unconfounded trials comparing amphetamine with placebo. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsSeven studies involving 172 patients were included. The quality of the trials varied but was generally high. Based on two trials (85 patients) there was no evidence that amphetamine treatment reduced death or dependence (Peto's odds ratio, [Peto OR] 1.54; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.64 to 3.73). In these two trials, there were imbalances at baseline, with more serious strokes allocated to amphetamine. This imbalance may account for the trend for more deaths at the end of follow-up among amphetamine allocated patients (Peto OR 3.33; 95% CI 0.99 to 11.24). Based on 4 studies (95 patients) there was evidence of a better relative change in motor function according to the Fugl-Meyer motor scale (Weighted Mean Difference, [WMD] -8.17 points; 95% CI -13.58 to -2.76) and based on 1 study (21 patients) there was evidence of a better change in language function as assessed by the Porch Index of Communicative Ability score (WMD -7.51 points; 95% CI -14.42 to -0.60) in amphetamine allocated patients. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAt present, too few patients have been studied to draw any definite conclusions about the effects of amphetamine treatment on recovery from stroke. The suggested benefits on motor and language function, and the non-significant trend towards increased risk of death, could be related to imbalances in prognostic variables or other bias in studies. Further research in this area is therefore justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.