SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Treatment of infantile spasms.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Size Does Not Fit All: Novel Individualized Use of Dexamethasone in Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- The multiple hit model of infantile and epileptic spasms: The 2025 update.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Vigabatrin and mental retardation in tuberous sclerosis: infantile spasms versus focal seizures.Journal of child neurology · 2013Article
- Safety and efficacy of vigabatrin for the treatment of infantile spasms.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure, usually hypsarrhythmia and in the majority of people, psychomotor retardation. It remains poorly understood and despite modern imaging techniques an underlying cause is often not found. Little is known about their pathophysiological basis and treatment remains problematic.
objectivesTo compare the effects of single drugs used to treat infantile spasms in terms of long-term psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, control of the spasms and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Our search included the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register, MEDLINE (1966 to 2003) and EMBASE (1981 to 2003), contacting pharmaceutical companies and appeals at international conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the administration of drugs to people with infantile spasms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included cessation of spasms, time to cessation of spasms, participants with cessation of spasms remaining spasm free, reduction in spasms, resolution of hypsarrhythmia, subsequent epilepsy rates and adverse effects. MAIN
resultsEleven RCTs were included, who in total recruited just 514 participants and tested eight different drugs. Overall, methodology of the studies was poor. No study assessed long-term psychomotor development or onset of other seizure types. One small study found vigabatrin to be more efficacious than hydrocortisone in stopping infantile spasms in a group of people with tuberous sclerosis. One underpowered study showed a trend for vigabatrin to be more efficacious than placebo in stopping infantile spasms. Two small studies when combined showed ACTH to be more efficacious than low-dose prednisone (2 mg/kg). One study also suggested that control of spasms occurred more frequently with high dose vigabatrin as compared to low dose vigabatrin. It was not possible to compare reduction in the number of spasms between the different treatments because of differences in methods of analysis. Overall, only 18 individuals were reported to have been withdrawn from the trial treatments due to adverse effects and 4 deaths were reported. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsWe found no single treatment to be proven to be more efficacious in treating infantile spasms than any of the others (other than vigabatrin in the treatment of infantile spasms in tuberous sclerosis in one underpowered study). Few studies considered psychomotor development or subsequent seizure rates as outcomes and none had long-term follow-up. Further trials with larger numbers of participants, and longer follow-up are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12917912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.