Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12917900›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

J S Birks, R Harvey

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Huperzine A for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Donepezil for mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  10. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Nicotine for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Preserving cognition through an integrated cognitive stimulation and training program.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Trial
  17. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  18. Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J S BirksDepartment of Clinical Geratology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, OX2 6HE.
R Harvey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One of the aims of therapy is to inhibit the breakdown of a chemical neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, by blocking the relevant enzyme. This can be done by a group of chemicals known as cholinesterase inhibitors. However, some (like tacrine) are associated with adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, but donepezil (E2020, Aricept) is safer.

objectivesThe objective of this review is to assess whether donepezil improves the well-being of patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'Aricept' on 9 October 2002. This Register contains up-to-date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was compared with placebo for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB ), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted mean differences or Peto odds ratios (95%CI) estimated. MAIN

resultsSixteen trials are included, involving 4365 participants. The trials were of 12, 24 or 52 weeks duration in selected patients. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function and global clinical state, but data on several important dimensions of outcome are unavailable. For cognition there is a statistically significant improvement for both 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil at 24 weeks compared with placebo (-2.02 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD, 95%CI -2.77 to -1.26, p<0.00001; -2.92 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD 95% CI -3.74 to -2.10, p<0.00001)and for 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo at 52 weeks (1.84MMSE points, 95% CI, 0.53 to3.15, p=0.006). The results show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by an independent clinician) in people treated with 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil compared with placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour. There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10 mg/day (but not the 5 mg/day) donepezil group compared with placebo which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10 mg/day.A variety of adverse effects were recorded, with more incidents of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and anorexia in the 10 mg/day group compared with placebo and the 5 mg/day group, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsPeople with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12, 24 or 52 weeks with donepezil experienced benefits in cognitive function, activities of daily living and behaviour. Study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients, and measured less decline in measures of global disease severity. Although no significant changes were measured on a patient-rated quality of life scales, the instrument used was crude and possibly unsuited to the task. The additional data now available confirm the findings of the previous issue of this review and extend the evidence for the effectiveness of treatment to at least 52 weeks and to those with severe dementia. More evidence is still needed for the economic efficacy of donepezil, but clinical efficacy is confirmed.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsCognition DisordersDonepezilHumansIndansNootropic AgentsPiperidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilIndansNootropic AgentsPiperidines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.