SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
178 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Can IVIG Intervene in AD? Insights from Animal Experiments and Clinical Trials-A Systematic Review and Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- L-Carnitine in the Treatment of Psychiatric and Neurological Manifestations: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of 5 and 10 mg donepezil in improving cognitive function in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping new pharmacological interventions for cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in dementia: A systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Huperzine A for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Functional outcomes of drug treatment in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Drugs & aging · 2007Pooled it
- Donepezil for mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Alzheimer's disease: systematic review of randomised clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Pooled it
- Nicotine for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Safety and Pharmacokinetics of HTL0018318, a Novel MDrugs in R&D · 2021Trial
- Evaluating the cognitive effects of donepezil 23 mg/d in moderate and severe Alzheimer's disease: analysis of effects of baseline features on treatment response.BMC geriatrics · 2013Trial
- Assessing therapeutic efficacy in a progressive disease: a study of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease.CNS drugs · 2006Trial
- Preserving cognition through an integrated cognitive stimulation and training program.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasTrial
- Article
- Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Reverse the progression of Alzheimer's disease through Nano-ERASER-based adult neuroregeneration.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- CellSwarm-AD: A Multi-Scale Agent-Based Framework for Virtual Alzheimer's Disease Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One of the aims of therapy is to inhibit the breakdown of a chemical neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, by blocking the relevant enzyme. This can be done by a group of chemicals known as cholinesterase inhibitors. However, some (like tacrine) are associated with adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, but donepezil (E2020, Aricept) is safer.
objectivesThe objective of this review is to assess whether donepezil improves the well-being of patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'Aricept' on 9 October 2002. This Register contains up-to-date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was compared with placebo for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB ), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted mean differences or Peto odds ratios (95%CI) estimated. MAIN
resultsSixteen trials are included, involving 4365 participants. The trials were of 12, 24 or 52 weeks duration in selected patients. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function and global clinical state, but data on several important dimensions of outcome are unavailable. For cognition there is a statistically significant improvement for both 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil at 24 weeks compared with placebo (-2.02 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD, 95%CI -2.77 to -1.26, p<0.00001; -2.92 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD 95% CI -3.74 to -2.10, p<0.00001)and for 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo at 52 weeks (1.84MMSE points, 95% CI, 0.53 to3.15, p=0.006). The results show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by an independent clinician) in people treated with 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil compared with placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour. There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10 mg/day (but not the 5 mg/day) donepezil group compared with placebo which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10 mg/day.A variety of adverse effects were recorded, with more incidents of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and anorexia in the 10 mg/day group compared with placebo and the 5 mg/day group, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsPeople with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12, 24 or 52 weeks with donepezil experienced benefits in cognitive function, activities of daily living and behaviour. Study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients, and measured less decline in measures of global disease severity. Although no significant changes were measured on a patient-rated quality of life scales, the instrument used was crude and possibly unsuited to the task. The additional data now available confirm the findings of the previous issue of this review and extend the evidence for the effectiveness of treatment to at least 52 weeks and to those with severe dementia. More evidence is still needed for the economic efficacy of donepezil, but clinical efficacy is confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12917900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.