Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12917886›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.

G J Hofmeyr, M E Hannah

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009
    Pooled it
  7. Techniques for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G J HofmeyrEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand), Frere/Cecilia Makiwane Hospitals, Private Bag 9047, East London 5200, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
M E Hannah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine use of caesarean section for breech presentation is widespread. However, poor outcomes after breech birth might be the result of underlying conditions causing breech presentation rather than damage during delivery.

objectivesTo assess the effects of planned caesarean section for singleton breech presentation at term on measures of pregnancy outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (November 2002) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing planned caesarean section for singleton breech presentation at term with planned vaginal birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed trial eligibility and quality. MAIN

resultsThree trials (2396 participants) were included in the review. Caesarean delivery occurred in 550/1227 (45%) of those women allocated to a vaginal delivery protocol. Perinatal or neonatal death (excluding fatal anomalies) or serious neonatal morbidity was reduced (relative risk (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.56) with planned caesarean section. The reduction in risk of perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity was less for countries with high national perinatal mortality rates. Perinatal or neonatal death (excluding fatal anomalies) was also reduced (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.86) with planned caesarean section. The proportional reductions were similar for countries with low and high national perinatal mortality rates. Planned caesarean section was associated with modestly increased short-term maternal morbidity (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.61). At 3 months after delivery, women allocated to the planned caesarean section group reported less urinary incontinence (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.93); more abdominal pain (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.29 to 2. 79); and less perineal pain (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.58). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsPlanned caesarean section compared with planned vaginal birth reduced perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity for the singleton breech baby at term, at the expense of somewhat increased maternal morbidity. Information on long-term consequences of caesarean section, such as reproductive function and emotional adjustment, is limited. The option of external cephalic version is dealt with in separate reviews. The data from this review cannot be generalised to settings where women labour and birth at home, or where caesarean section is not readily available, or to methods of breech delivery that differ materially from the clinical delivery protocols used in the trials reviewed. The review will help to inform individualised decision-making regarding breech delivery.

Indexed as

Breech PresentationCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.