Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12917485›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.

Christos Sotiriou, Soek-Ying Neo, Lisa M McShane, Edward L Korn, Philip M Long, Amir Jazaeri, Philippe Martiat, Steve B Fox, Adrian L Harris, Edison T Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00542191 (Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Metronomic Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 753 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
753citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00542191 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Metronomic Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeo W. Jenkins Cancer CenterRan2007 to 2016Enrolled30ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDoxorubicin / Cyclophosphamide / Paclitaxel / Carboplatin, Definitive Surgery, Radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

753 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,995 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (CaelyxCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An insight into the therapeutic effects of isoliquiritigenin in breast cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

693 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christos SotiriouDivision of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Advanced Technology Center, 8717 Grovemont Circle, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA.
Soek-Ying Neo
Lisa M McShane
Edward L Korn
Philip M Long
Amir Jazaeri
Philippe Martiat
Steve B Fox
Adrian L Harris
Edison T Liu
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive gene expression patterns generated from cDNA microarrays were correlated with detailed clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome in an unselected group of 99 node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients. Gene expression patterns were found to be strongly associated with estrogen receptor (ER) status and moderately associated with grade, but not associated with menopausal status, nodal status, or tumor size. Hierarchical cluster analysis segregated the tumors into two main groups based on their ER status, which correlated well with basal and luminal characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified 16 genes that were significantly associated with relapse-free survival at a stringent significance level of 0.001 to account for multiple comparisons. Of 231 genes previously reported by others [van't Veer, L. J., et al. (2002) Nature 415, 530-536] as being associated with survival, 93 probe elements overlapped with the set of 7,650 probe elements represented on the arrays used in this study. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the set of 93 probe elements segregated our population into two distinct subgroups with different relapse-free survival (P < 0.03). The number of these 93 probe elements showing significant univariate association with relapse-free survival (P < 0.05) in the present study was 14, representing 11 unique genes. Genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, and chromosomal stability were consistently elevated in the various poor prognostic groups. In addition, glutathione S-transferase M3 emerged as an important survival marker in both studies. When taken together with other array studies, our results highlight the consistent biological and clinical associations with gene expression profiles.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMultigene FamilyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID12917485
PMCPMC193572
OpenAlexW1999463736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.