Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12914683›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2003

Orbital inflammation.

Kimberly P Cockerham, Sang H Hong, Ellen E Browne

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary Malignant Orbital Tumors.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimberly P CockerhamNeuro-ophthalmology, Orbital Disease and Plastic Reconstruction, Allegheny General Hospital, 420 East North Avenue, Suite 116, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA. kpcorb@aol.com
Sang H Hong
Ellen E Browne
Allegheny General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital inflammation is a common problem in adults and children, accounting for the majority of all orbital processes. The presentation may be acute, subacute, or insidious. When the onset is acute, the process can be mistaken for orbital cellulitis. In insidious cases, such as the sclerosing subtype of inflammation, the chronic painless course may prompt concerns about a neoplastic infiltration such as lymphoma. Orbital inflammation can be divided into nonspecific, idiopathic, and other specific diagnoses. The differential diagnosis includes allergic, infectious (fungal, mycobacterial, and parasitic), and neoplastic (lymphoma or metastatic) disease. Orbital inflammation impacts neurologists and neuro-ophthalmologists because all of the entities can cause afferent dysfunction (decreased vision, abnormal color perception, afferent pupillary defect, and visual field defect) and dysmotility. The pattern of motility deficit may mimic the more familiar cranial nerve palsies. Advances in the diagnosis and management of nonspecific orbital inflammation and the specific entities that cause orbital inflammation are discussed.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialHumansInflammationOrbital Diseases

Identifiers

PMID12914683
OpenAlexW3193096839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.