Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12913170›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2003

Systematic trans-genomic comparison of protein kinases between Arabidopsis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Degeng Wang, Jeffrey F Harper, Michael Gribskov

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Nuclear Signaling of Plant MAPKs.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Novel links in the plant TOR kinase signaling network.Current opinion in plant biology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Loss of post-translational modification sites in disease.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Degeng WangSan Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0537, USA. dwang@sdsc.edu
Jeffrey F Harper
Michael Gribskov
San Diego Supercomputer Center · USScripps Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

VISUALIZATION TOOLS FOR AUTOMATED MOLECULAR MICROSCOPYP41RR008605 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAPADOPOULOS, PHILIP · 1994 to 2011
$28.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41-RR08605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome of the budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) provides an important paradigm for transgenomic comparisons with other eukaryotic species. Here, we report a systematic comparison of the protein kinases of yeast (119 kinases) and a reference plant Arabidopsis (1,019 kinases). Using a whole-protein-based, hierarchical clustering approach, the complete set of protein kinases from both species were clustered. We validated our clustering by three observations: (a) clustering pattern of functional orthologs proven in genetic complementation experiments, (b) consistency with reported classifications of yeast kinases, and (c) consistency with the biochemical properties of those Arabidopsis kinases already experimentally characterized. The clustering pattern identified no overlap between yeast kinases and the receptor-like kinases (RLKs) of Arabidopsis. Ten more kinase families were found to be specific for one of the two species. Among them, the calcium-dependent protein kinase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase families are specific for plants, whereas the Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase and provirus insertion in mouse-like kinase families were found only in yeast and animals. Three yeast kinase families, nitrogen permease reactivator/halotolerance-5), polyamine transport kinase, and negative regulator of sexual conjugation and meiosis, are absent in both plants and animals. The majority of yeast kinase families (21 of 26) display Arabidopsis counterparts, and all are mapped into Arabidopsis families of intracellular kinases that are not related to RLKs. Representatives from 11 of the common families (54 kinases from Arabidopsis and 17 from yeast) share an extremely high degree of similarity (blast E value < 10(-80)), suggesting the likelihood of orthologous functions. Selective expansion of yeast kinase families was observed in Arabidopsis. This is most evident for yeast genes CBK1, HRR25, and SNF1 and the kinase family S6K. Reduction of kinase families was also observed, as in the case of the NEK-like family. The distinguishing features between the two sets of kinases are the selective expansion of yeast families and the generation of a limited number of new kinase families for new functionality in Arabidopsis, most notably, the Arabidopsis RLKs that constitute important components of plant intercellular communication apparatus.

Indexed as

GenomicsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGenome, FungalGenome, PlantMultigene FamilyPhosphorylationPhylogenyProtein KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpecies SpecificityArabidopsis ProteinsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID12913170
PMCPMC181299
OpenAlexW2129828673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.