Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12911644›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2003

Dimensions of patient-provider communication and diabetes self-care in an ethnically diverse population.

John D Piette, Dean Schillinger, Michael B Potter, Michele Heisler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00012649 (Improving Diabetes Care Via Telephone Assessment and Patient Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00012649 completednot on this map

Improving Diabetes Care Via Telephone Assessment and Patient Education

TypeobservationalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsEnrolled480ConditionsDiabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The effect of patient-provider communication on medication adherence in hypertensive black patients: does race concordance matter?Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2012
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. General versus disease-specific health literacy in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John D PietteCenter for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Mich 48113-0170, USA. jpiette@umich.edu
Dean Schillinger
Michael B Potter
Michele Heisler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-provider communication is essential for effective care of diabetes and other chronic illnesses. However, the relative impact of general versus disease-specific communication on self-management is poorly understood, as are the determinants of these 2 communication dimensions.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingThree VA heath care systems, 1 county health care system, and 1 university-based health care system. PATIENTS: Seven hundred fifty-two diabetes patients were enrolled. Fifty-two percent were nonwhite, 18% had less than a high-school education, and 8% were primarily Spanish-speaking. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPatients' assessments of providers' general and diabetes-specific communication were measured using validated scales. Self-reported foot care; and adherence to hypoglycemic medications, dietary recommendations, and exercise were measured using standard items. General and diabetes-specific communication reports were only moderately correlated (r =.35) and had differing predictors. In multivariate probit analyses, both dimensions of communication were independently associated with self-care in each of the 4 areas examined. Sociodemographically vulnerable patients (racial and language minorities and those with less education) reported communication that was as good or better than that reported by other patients. Patients receiving most of their diabetes care from their primary provider and patients with a longer primary care relationship reported better general communication. VA and county clinic patients reported better diabetes-specific communication than did university clinic patients.

conclusionsGeneral and diabetes-specific communication are related but unique facets of patient-provider interactions, and improving either one may improve self-management. Providers in these sites are communicating successfully with vulnerable patients. These findings reinforce the potential importance of continuity and differences among VA, county, and university health care systems as determinants of patient-provider communication.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersProfessional-Patient RelationsSelf CareAgedDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusEthnicityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisVirginia

Identifiers

PMID12911644
PMCPMC1494904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.