Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12911029›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2003

Potential for retroposition by old Alu subfamilies.

Karla Johanning, Claudina Alemán Stevenson, Oluwatosin O Oyeniran, Yair M Gozal, Astrid M Roy-Engel, Jerzy Jurka, Prescott L Deininger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human Genomic Deletions Generated by SVA-Associated Events.Comparative and functional genomics · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tracking Alu evolution in New World primates.BMC evolutionary biology · 2005
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karla JohanningTulane Cancer Center SL-66, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Tulane University Medical Center, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Claudina Alemán Stevenson
Oluwatosin O Oyeniran
Yair M Gozal
Astrid M Roy-Engel
Jerzy Jurka
Prescott L Deininger
Tulane Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center · USGenetic Information Research Institute · USTulane University · US

Funding

Sine RetrotranspositionR01GM045668 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 1993 to 2014
$4.2M
Pilot studies: Alteration of gene regulation by environmental compoundsS11ES009996 · NIEHS · XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI BLAKE, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2003
$3.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS 1S11ES09996NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM45668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alu elements sharing sequence characteristics of the "old" subfamilies are thought to currently be retrotranspositionally inactive. We analyzed one of these old subfamilies of Alu elements, Sx, for sequence conservation relative to the consensus and the length of the "A-tail" as parameters to define the presence of potential Alu Sx source genes in the human genome. Sequence identity to the left half or the right half of the Alu Sx consensus sequence was evaluated for 4424 complete elements obtained from the human genome draft sequence. A small subset of Alu Sx left halves were found to be more conserved than any of the Alu Sx right halves. Selection for promoter function in active elements may explain the slightly higher conservation of the left half. In order to determine whether this sequence identity was the result of recent activity, or simply sequence conservation for older elements, PCR amplification of some of the loci containing Sx elements with conserved left/right halves from different primate genomes was carried out. Several of these Sx Alus were found to have amplified at a later evolutionary period (<35 mya) than expected based on previous studies of Sx elements. Analysis of "A-tail" length, a feature correlated with current retroposition activity, varied between Alu Sx element loci in different primates, where the length increased in specific Alu elements in the human genome. The presence of few conserved Alu Sx elements and the dynamic expansion/contraction of the A-tail suggests that some of these older subfamilies may still be active at very low levels or in a few individuals.

Indexed as

Alu ElementsEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceGenome, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence DataPrimatesPromoter Regions, GeneticShort Interspersed Nucleotide Elements

Identifiers

PMID12911029
OpenAlexW2116729229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.