Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12907950›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2003

A comparison of gene repair strategies in cell culture using a lacZ reporter system.

H D Nickerson, W H Colledge

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Parameters of oligonucleotide-mediated gene modification in mouse ES cells.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H D NickersonDepartment of Physiology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, UK.
W H Colledge

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic oligonucleotides and DNA fragments of less than 1 kilobase (kb) have been shown to cause site-specific genetic alterations in mammalian cells in culture and in vivo. We have used a lacZ reporter gene system to compare the efficiency of episomal and chromosomal gene repair in human embryonic kidney epithelial cells (HEK293), Chinese Hamster Ovary fibroblasts (CHOK1), human bronchial epithelial cells (16HBE), and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. The lacZ gene contains a G to A nucleotide change, (Glu to Lys mutation) that abrogates beta-galactosidase activity. We compared the efficiency of different gene repair methods to correct this mutation and restore beta-galactosidase activity. We evaluated PCR-generated double-stranded DNA fragments of 0.52-1.9 kb, single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides of 20, 35, or 80 bases containing internal phosphorothioate links, and a 68 base RNA:DNA oligonucleotide. All of the oligonucleotides and DNA fragments showed some gene repair ability with an episomal plasmid. Short DNA fragments of 0.52 kb or greater gave the highest frequencies of episomal gene repair while single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides gave the highest frequency of chromosomal repair. In the context of a chromosomal target, antisense DNA oligonucleotides gave 5-fold higher frequencies of gene repair than their sense counterparts. The RNA:DNA chimeric oligonucleotide gave little or no gene repair on either a chromosomal or episomal target.

Indexed as

ChromosomesDNA RepairBlotting, SouthernBlotting, WesternCell LineEpithelial CellsGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyHumansLac OperonPrecipitin TestsTransfection

Identifiers

PMID12907950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.