Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2003
No dose-dependent tubulotoxicity of 5-aminosalicylic acid: a prospective study in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsElevated levels of renal tubular markers in the urine are found in 20-30% of patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. We investigated whether this reflects a dose-dependent tubulotoxicity of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). PATIENTS AND
methodsIn an open, prospective, multicenter study 18 patients with Crohn's disease and 29 with ulcerative colitis were treated with 3 g 5-ASA or more daily as the sole drug for 6 weeks. Clinical activity (CDAI, CAI) and renal tubular markers [beta-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase (beta-NAG) and other proteins in urine] were monitored. We examined whether the proportion of patients with elevated beta-NAG is more than 15% higher (absolute difference) than that prior to treatment.
resultsThe proportion decreased from 19.2% to 12.8% in the intention-to-treat analysis (n=47) and from 24.3% to 13.5% in the per-protocol analysis (n=37), which was not more than 15% higher than at baseline. Mean CDAI decreased from 222 to 146 and mean CAI from 7.3 to 3.1 (intention-to-treat analysis). Response to therapy was shown by 61% of patients with Crohn's disease and 66% of patients with ulcerative colitis. The cumulative dose of 5-ASA was not correlated with beta-NAG level in the urine.
conclusionThis study largely rules out that 5-ASA at 3 g or higher per day for 6 weeks induces renal tubular damage. Elevated renal tubular markers reflect inflammatory activity or an extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.