Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12904583›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

A large-scale, gene-driven mutagenesis approach for the functional analysis of the mouse genome.

Jens Hansen, Thomas Floss, Petra Van Sloun, Ernst-Martin Füchtbauer, Franz Vauti, Hans-Hennig Arnold, Frank Schnütgen, Wolfgang Wurst, Harald von Melchner, Patricia Ruiz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Genome-Wide Binding Profile for Human RE1 Silencing Transcription Factor Unveils a Unique Genetic Circuitry in Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modeling the study of DNA damage responses in mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gene-trap mutagenesis using Mol/MSM-1 embryonic stem cells from MSM/Ms mice.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2013
    Article
  18. Inactivation of the microRNA-183/96/182 cluster results in syndromic retinal degeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jens HansenInstitute of Developmental Genetics, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Thomas Floss
Petra Van Sloun
Ernst-Martin Füchtbauer
Franz Vauti
Hans-Hennig Arnold
Frank Schnütgen
Wolfgang Wurst
Harald von Melchner
Patricia Ruiz
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge of the postgenomic era is the functional characterization of every single gene within the mammalian genome. In an effort to address this challenge, we assembled a collection of mutations in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, which is the largest publicly accessible collection of such mutations to date. Using four different gene-trap vectors, we generated 5,142 sequences adjacent to the gene-trap integration sites (gene-trap sequence tags; http://genetrap.de) from >11,000 ES cell clones. Although most of the gene-trap vector insertions occurred randomly throughout the genome, we found both vector-independent and vector-specific integration "hot spots." Because >50% of the hot spots were vector-specific, we conclude that the most effective way to saturate the mouse genome with gene-trap insertions is by using a combination of gene-trap vectors. When a random sample of gene-trap integrations was passaged to the germ line, 59% (17 of 29) produced an observable phenotype in transgenic mice, a frequency similar to that achieved by conventional gene targeting. Thus, gene trapping allows a large-scale and cost-effective production of ES cell clones with mutations distributed throughout the genome, a resource likely to accelerate genome annotation and the in vivo modeling of human disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell LineDNAGenetic VectorsGenomicsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMutagenesis, InsertionalPhenotypeSequence Tagged SitesStem CellsDNA

Identifiers

PMID12904583
PMCPMC187885
OpenAlexW2168822770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.