Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12904349›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparison of five genotypic techniques for identification of optochin-resistant pneumococcus-like isolates.

Rita Verhelst, Tarja Kaijalainen, Thierry De Baere, Gerda Verschraegen, Geert Claeys, Leen Van Simaey, Catharine De Ganck, Mario Vaneechoutte

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and other Mitis streptococci: importance of molecular methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Detection of Pneumococcal DNA in Blood by Polymerase Chain Reaction for Diagnosing Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Young Children From Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rita VerhelstDepartment of Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium. Rita.Verhelst@ugent
Tarja Kaijalainen
Thierry De Baere
Gerda Verschraegen
Geert Claeys
Leen Van Simaey
Catharine De Ganck
Mario Vaneechoutte

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three PCR techniques (amplification of the psaA, ply, and lytA genes) and a commercial kit (AccuProbe [GenProbe, San Diego, Calif.], based on hybridization with the 16S rRNA gene), all four of which claimed to be specific for Streptococcus pneumoniae, were used to identify 49 alpha-hemolytic streptococcal isolates suspected of being pneumococci. The definite phenotypic identification of these organisms as S. pneumoniae was difficult when optochin susceptibility and the presence of a capsule were taken as markers. Furthermore, RsaI digestion of the amplified 16S rRNA gene was applied. All 49 strains were optochin resistant. Eleven of these were encapsulated and were identified as pneumococci by all tests. Twenty of the 38 unencapsulated strains were unambiguously identified as nonpneumococci by all tests. The identities of another 18 unencapsulated strains remained inconclusive due to highly variable reactions for all phenotypic and genotypic techniques applied. The AccuProbe test was positive for seven strains for which the results of the other tests were inconclusive. RsaI restriction of the amplified 16S rRNA gene confirmed the AccuProbe result for all strains, while the result of the psaA-specific PCR was in concordance with encapsulation for all strains. The results presented here indicate that identification problems continue to exist for some strains, despite the application of genotypic and phenotypic tests in combination. We found the psaA-specific PCR to be the genotypic technique best suited for the identification of genuine pneumococci and optochin-resistant pneumococci.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialQuinineBacterial Typing TechniquesGenes, BacterialGenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticStreptococcus pneumoniaeethylhydrocupreineQuinineReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID12904349
PMCPMC179870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.