Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12904348›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis compared to IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for investigation of apparently clustered cases of tuberculosis.

Peter M Hawkey, E Grace Smith, Jason T Evans, Philip Monk, Gerry Bryan, Huda H Mohamed, Madhu Bardhan, R Nicholas Pugh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Using Whole-genome Sequencing to Determine the Timing of Secondary Tuberculosis in British Columbia, Canada.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in British Columbia, Canada: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Diversity ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter M HawkeyPublic Health Laboratory, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, United Kingdom. peter.hawkey@heartsol.wmids.nhs.uk
E Grace Smith
Jason T Evans
Philip Monk
Gerry Bryan
Huda H Mohamed
Madhu Bardhan
R Nicholas Pugh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An evaluation of the utility of IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing compared to a combination of variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit (MIRU) typing was undertaken. A total of 53 patient isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from four presumed episodes of cross-infection were examined. Genomic DNA was extracted from the isolates by a cetyl trimethylammonium bromide method. The number of copies of tandem repeats of the five loci ETR(A) to ETR(E) and 12 MIRU loci was determined by PCR amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplicons. VNTR typing identified the major clusters of strains in the three investigations in which they occurred (each representing a different evolutionary clade: 32333, 42235, and 32433). The majority of unrelated isolates (by epidemiology and RFLP typing) were also identified by VNTR typing. The concordance between the RFLP and MIRU typing was complete, with the exception of two isolates with RFLP patterns that differed by one band each from the rest of the major epidemiologically linked groups of isolates in investigation A. All of these isolates had identical MIRU and VNTR types. A further pair of isolates differed in the number of tandem repeat copies at two MIRU alleles but had identical RFLP patterns. The speed of the combined VNTR and MIRU typing approach enabled results for some of the investigations to be supplied in "real time," influencing choices in contact tracing. The ease of comparison of results of MIRU and VNTR typing, which are recorded as single multidigit numbers, was also found to greatly facilitate investigation management and the communication of results to health care professionals.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesDisease OutbreaksDNA, BacterialHumansMinisatellite RepeatsMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTuberculosisDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID12904348
PMCPMC179797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.