Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12904347›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparison of molecular tests for detection and quantification of cell-associated cytomegalovirus DNA.

Angela M Caliendo, Belinda Yen-Lieberman, Jovana Baptista, Janet Andersen, Clyde Crumpacker, Rob Schuurman, Stephen A Spector, James Bremer, Nell S Lurain

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta-herpesviruses in febrile children with cancer.Emerging infectious diseases · 2008
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela M CaliendoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. acalien@emory.edu
Belinda Yen-Lieberman
Jovana Baptista
Janet Andersen
Clyde Crumpacker
Rob Schuurman
Stephen A Spector
James Bremer
Nell S Lurain
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USEmory University · USPresbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

DAIDS VIROLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMN01AI035172 · NIAID · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BREMER, JAMES W. · 1993 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01AI35172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cell-based standard was developed to compare the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor test, the Hybrid Capture System CMV DNA test, and the NucliSens CMV test. The standard was prepared by infecting human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) strain AD169 at low multiplicity of infection (0.03) and harvesting the cells at 6 h postinfection. Buffy coat cells were added to produce concentrations of from 0 to 10(5) HFFs per 10(6) total cells. Five laboratories performed the Amplicor PCR test and two laboratories performed the NucliSens and Hybrid Capture tests. The Amplicor PCR test was 1.5 to 2.0 log(10) more sensitive than the Hybrid Capture test. The specificities of the Amplicor PCR and Hybrid Capture tests were 100 and 93.8%, respectively. The linear range of the Amplicor PCR and Hybrid Capture tests were 2 to 4.48 log(10) and 3.48 to at least 5.0 log(10) CMV target cells, respectively. The standard deviations of the Amplicor PCR and Hybrid Capture tests varied throughout their linear range, and for both tests the variability was greater for lower concentrations of input CMV DNA. These data allow the direct comparison of viral load values between the Amplicor and Hybrid Capture tests. The analytical sensitivity of the NucliSens test could not be determined by using the 6-h standard, because the low multiplicity of infection and short culture time did not allow for adequate transcription of pp67 late mRNA measured in the test. Extending the incubation time of the standard to 24 h increased the analytical sensitivity of the NucliSens test to 3.0 log(10) target cells.

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusDNA, ViralFibroblastsGene AmplificationHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySkinViral LoadDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID12904347
PMCPMC179805
OpenAlexW2099291198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.