Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12904090›Full record

Trial reportDrugs2003

Insulin glargine: an updated review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Christopher J Dunn, Greg L Plosker, Gillian M Keating, Kate McKeage, Lesley J Scott

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The highest (3600 IU) reported overdose of insulin glargine ever and management.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Modern basal insulin analogs: An incomplete story.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Insulin glargine in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Vascular health and risk management · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher J DunnAdis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand.
Greg L Plosker
Gillian M Keating
Kate McKeage
Lesley J Scott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin glargine is a human insulin analogue prepared by recombinant DNA technology. Modification of the human insulin molecule at position A21 and at the C-terminus of the B-chain results in the formation of a stable compound that is soluble at pH 4.0, but forms amorphous microprecipitates in subcutaneous tissue from which small amounts of insulin glargine are gradually released. The plasma concentration versus time profile of insulin glargine is therefore relatively constant in relation to conventional human insulins, with no pronounced peak over 24 hours. This allows once-daily administration as basal therapy. Early randomised trials with insulin glargine generally showed greater reductions in fasting blood or plasma glucose levels and a reduced frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia relative to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. In addition to this basal therapy, patients continued to use the regular mealtime insulin regimen to which they were accustomed. More recent data with insulin glargine have included evidence of improved glycaemic control, with improvements in satisfaction with treatment over NPH insulin. Furthermore, the time of day at which insulin glargine is injected has no clinically relevant effect on glycaemic control in these patients. There are also data from small, nonblind studies to suggest comparable glycaemic control with insulin glargine and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Results from comparative studies and meta-analyses in individuals with type 2 diabetes show lower incidences of nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine than with NPH insulin, with two studies showing a significantly greater improvement in glycosylated haemoglobin levels with insulin glargine than with NPH. Insulin glargine is well tolerated, and is not associated with greater immunogenicity or increases in bodyweight than NPH insulin. Long-term data show maintenance of glycaemic control with insulin glargine for up to 39 months in adults and children with type 1 and adults with type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, insulin glargine is an effective and well tolerated basal insulin therapy when given as a single daily subcutaneous injection to patients with diabetes, with benefits in terms of glycaemic control and reduced frequency of hypoglycaemia over regimens based on conventional basal insulins. Accumulating data and official recommendations show the suitability of insulin glargine for first-line use in selected patients with type 2 diabetes who require insulin treatment, as well as in patients with type 1 disease, and confirm its use in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Drug Administration ScheduleTreatment OutcomeAdolescentAdultAgedDiabetes MellitusHumansInjections, SubcutaneousInsulinInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingMiddle AgedTime FactorsUnited KingdomInsulinInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-Acting

Identifiers

PMID12904090
OpenAlexW2079824131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.