Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12902542›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2003

Horizontal gene transfer: a critical view.

C G Kurland, B Canback, Otto G Berg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Horizontal Gene Transfer Involving Chloroplasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Mobilome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Descent of Bacteria and Eukarya From an Archaeal Root of Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C G KurlandDepartment of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden.
B Canback
Otto G Berg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been suggested that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is the "essence of phylogeny." In contrast, much data suggest that this is an exaggeration resulting in part from a reliance on inadequate methods to identify HGT events. In addition, the assumption that HGT is a ubiquitous influence throughout evolution is questionable. Instead, rampant global HGT is likely to have been relevant only to primitive genomes. In modern organisms we suggest that both the range and frequencies of HGT are constrained most often by selective barriers. As a consequence those HGT events that do occur most often have little influence on genome phylogeny. Although HGT does occur with important evolutionary consequences, classical Darwinian lineages seem to be the dominant mode of evolution for modern organisms.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene Transfer, HorizontalModels, GeneticAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaGenomeHumansPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID12902542
PMCPMC187805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.