ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2003
Comparing the dehalogenase gene pool in cultivated alpha-halocarboxylic acid-degrading bacteria with the environmental metagene pool.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Characterization of a L-2-Haloacid Dehalogenase FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Analysis of hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater metagenomes as revealed by high-throughput sequencing.Molecular biotechnology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches were used to determine the relationship between the dehalogenase gene pool in bacteria enriched and isolated on 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (22DCPA) and the environmental metagene pool (the collective gene pool of both the culturable and uncultured microbes) from which they were isolated. The dehalogenases in the pure-cultures isolates, which were able to degrade 22DCPA, were similar to previously described group I and II dehalogenases. Significantly, the majority of the dehalogenases isolated from activated sludge by degenerate PCR with primers specific for alpha-halocarboxylic acid dehalogenases were not closely related to the dehalogenases in any isolate. Furthermore, the dehalogenases found in the pure cultures predominated in the enrichments but were a minor component of the community used to inoculate the batch cultures. Phylogenetic analysis of the dehalogenase sequences isolated by degenerate PCR showed that the diversity of the group II deh gene was greater than that of the group I deh gene. Direct plating of the activated sludge onto minimal media supplemented with 22DCPA resulted in biomass and DNA from which dehalogenases were amplified. Analysis of the sequences revealed that they were much more closely related to the sequences found in the community used to start the enrichments. However, no pure cultures were obtained with this isolation method, and thus no pure cultures were available for identification. In this study we examined the link between genes found in pure cultures with the metagene pool from which they were isolated. The results show that there is a large bias introduced by culturing, not just in the bacteria isolated but also the degradative genes that they contain. Moreover, our findings serve as a caveat for studies involving the culturing of pure cultures of bacteria and conclusions which are drawn from analysis of these organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.