ReviewDer Anaesthesist2003
[Psychopharmacological treatment in the pre-clinical emergency medicine].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines in patients with psychiatric emergencies: results of an observational trial.BMC psychiatry · 2008Trial
- [Comparison of sublingual and intravenous administration of lorazepam in psychiatric emergencies in emergency medical services].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
- Perioperative management of delirium and dementia in the geriatric surgical patient.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2013Review
- [Assessment of psychiatric emergencies by physicians in the pre-hospital emergency medical system. A re-evaluation after 7 years].Der Anaesthesist · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric emergencies are a common cause for a call for the pre-clinical emergency physician (EP). However, previous studies reported serious problems in diagnosing and particularly treating these patients. Although evidence-based treatment guidelines and algorithms exist for the most important somatic disorders the EP has to deal with, they do not for psychiatric emergencies. It is the aim of this review, subsequent to an extensive overview on the available literature, to provide the reader with differentiated suggestions for pharmacological crisis intervention as well as with treatment recommendations for different psychiatric disorders with an emphasis on the special needs in the pre-clinical emergency medicine. After conducting a literature research from 1971 to 2002, 31 double-blind trials were found comparing different antipsychotics and benzodiazepines for efficacy and tolerability. Further, pharmacological data and product information of the most commonly used drugs were evaluated. Following, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines were generally assessed for their usefulness in the pre-clinical emergency medicine, the advantages of different drugs for specific indications are presented and dosage recommendations are given. As an antipsychotic, haloperidol still is the drug of choice. Within the benzodiazepines, lorazepam seems to have advantages over diazepam. An antipsychotic medication is particularly indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, mania, drug-induced psychoses and delirium whereas benzodiazepines are favourable for the treatment of anxiety, restlessness and agitation due to neurotic or reactive circumstances. There is some evidence suggesting that newer generation, so-called "atypical" antipsychotics may play a role in the treatment of psychiatric emergencies, however, controlled trials are necessary to substantiate their potential benefits in the preclinical emergency medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.