Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12897999›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2003

Transport of critically ill children in a resource-limited setting.

Mark Hatherill, Zainab Waggie, Louis Reynolds, Andrew Argent

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. A comparison of the content taught in critical care transportation modules across South African bachelor's degrees in emergency medical care.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of interhospital transport care for pediatric patients.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet?Critical care (London, England) · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark HatherillInstitute of Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Klipfontein Road, 7700 Cape Town, South Africa. hatheril@ich.uct.ac.za
Zainab Waggie
Louis Reynolds
Andrew Argent
Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo audit paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transfer activity and transfer-related adverse events in a resource-limited setting. DESIGN AND

settingTwenty-two bed regional PICU of a university children's hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Prospective 1-year audit of all children transferred directly from other hospitals. Data were collected for patient demographics, diagnostic category, referring hospital, transferring personnel, mode of transport, and technical, clinical, and critical adverse events. Data are median (interquartile range) or percentages. The transfers of 202 children, median age 2.8 months (1.1-14), median weight 3.5 kg (2.5-8.1) were analysed.

resultsMost transfers were performed by paramedic personnel (82%) and via road ambulance (76%). One or more technical adverse events occurred in 36%, clinical adverse events in 27%, and critical adverse events in 9% of children. Retrievals by intensive care staff (10%), all from rural hospitals, had a lower incidence of technical adverse events (0%). Children transferred from non-academic hospitals within the metropolitan area had the highest incidence of technical (44%), clinical (39%), and critical (17%) adverse events. Crude mortality was 17% ( n=34). Technical adverse events were not associated with mortality. Non-survivors were more likely to develop shock (32%) or hypoxia (26%) during transfer than survivors (10% and 11%, respectively).

conclusionsThere is a high incidence of transfer-related adverse events, most commonly in transfers from non-academic metropolitan hospitals. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of regional paediatric life support training or a specialised retrieval team on clinical adverse events and mortality.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaCost ControlCritical CareEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospitalsHumansHypoxiaInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePatient Transfer

Identifiers

PMID12897999
OpenAlexW1965915046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.