Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12897360›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2003

Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study.

P Bower, S Campbell, C Bojke, B Sibbald

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 280 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. General practice organisational models and heart failure medication adherence: multi-level evidence from a regional cohort in Emilia-Romagna, Italy.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P BowerNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. peter.bower@man.ac.uk
S Campbell
C Bojke
B Sibbald
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether practice structure (for example, list size, number of staff) predicts team processes and whether practice structure and team process in turn predict team outcomes

designObservational study using postal questionnaires and medical note audit. Team process was assessed through a measure of "climate" which examines shared perceptions of organisational policies, practices, and procedures.

settingPrimary care. SUBJECTS: Members of the primary health care team from 42 practices.

main outcome measuresObjective measures of quality of chronic disease management, patients' evaluations of practices, teams' self-reported ratings of effectiveness, and innovation.

resultsTeam climate was better in singlehanded practices than in partnerships. Practices with longer booking intervals provided superior chronic disease management. Higher team climate scores were associated with superior clinical care in diabetes, more positive patient evaluations of practice and self-reported innovation and effectiveness.

conclusionsAlthough the conclusions are preliminary because of the limited sample size, the study suggests that there are important relationships between team structure, process, and outcome that may be of relevance to quality improvement initiatives in primary care. Possible causal mechanisms that might underlie these associations remain to be determined.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementQuality of Health CareAngina PectorisAsthmaChronic DiseaseCooperative BehaviorDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health Services ResearchHumansMultivariate AnalysisPatient Care TeamPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareProfessional CompetenceUnited KingdomWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID12897360
PMCPMC1743743
OpenAlexW2110445220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.