ArticleAnnals of surgery2003
Significant host- and tumor-related factors for predicting prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic significance of pre-operative C-reactive protein and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of tumor biomarkers in predicting prognosis in esophageal cancer.BMC cancer · 2013Pooled it
- Association between C-reactive protein, incident liver cancer, and chronic liver disease mortality in the Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trials: a nested case-control study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015Trial
- Impairment of Nutritional Status and Quality of Life Following Minimal-Invasive Esophagectomy-A Prospective Cohort Analysis.Cancers · 2024Article
- Clinical significance of the modified Naples prognostic score in patients with stage II-III colon cancer undergoing curative resection: a retrospective study from the real world.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Donor-Related Risk Factors for Graft Decompensation Following Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Modified geriatric nutrition risk index as a prognostic predictor of esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- An Applicable Inflammation-Joined and Nutrition-Related Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Preoperative Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Cancer-Associated Muscle Wasting-Candidate Mechanisms and Molecular Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Linking Circulating Serum Proteins with Clinical Outcomes in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-An Emerging Role for Chemokines.Cancers · 2020Article
- Prognostic Prediction Models Based on Clinicopathological Indices in Patients With Resectable Lung Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels and postoperative survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019Article
- Novel prognostic score of postoperative complications after transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study of 90 consecutive patients.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2019Article
- Article
- Preoperative Plasma Fibrinogen is Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Predicts Prognosis in Resectable Esophageal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Role of Postoperative C-Reactive Protein Levels in Predicting Prognosis After Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.Gastrointestinal tumors · 2016Review
- High serum level of C-reactive protein is associated with worse outcome of patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with erlotinib.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify clinically useful parameters obtainable before treatment of predicting clinical outcomes in patients with esophageal carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Various factors regarding the biologic state of tumors or the nutritional state of patients have been individually reported to correlate with prognosis. Reliable estimates of life expectancy before treatment are important, and consideration needs to be given not only to tumor-related but also to host-related factors in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
methodsThe following clinicopathological factors were retrospectively analyzed in 356 consecutive patients with surgical treatment: sex; age; serum C-reactive protein (CRP); proportion of lymphocytes; body weight changes; serum albumin; clinical TNM staging; tumor location; serum squamous cell-related antigen; serum carcinoembryonic antigen; and histology. Factors related to prognosis were evaluated by using univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsAccording to univariate analysis, significant differences in survival were found for sex, serum CRP, proportion of lymphocytes, body weight change, serum albumin, serum squamous cell-related antigen, and clinical TNM staging. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CRP levels (P = 0.0285), body weight change (P = 0.0165), and clinical TNM staging (P = 0.0008) displayed independent correlations to prognosis. When serum CRP elevation, body weight loss, and clinical TNM staging III and IV were scored as a combined index, the total score (prognostic index for esophageal cancer, PIEC) demonstrated a good stratification value for prognosis. Moreover, PIEC was superior to the conventional clinical TNM staging by the likelihood ratio test.
conclusionsPIEC based on serum CRP, body weight change, and clinical TNM staging before treatment offers a very simple and informative method for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.