ReviewInvestigational new drugs2003
Clinical trial design for target specific anticancer agents.
Review in Investigational new drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Bioactive peptides for anticancer therapies.Biomaterials translational · 2023Review
- Methylwogonin exerts anticancer effects in A375 human malignant melanoma cells through apoptosis induction, DNA damage, cell invasion inhibition and downregulation of the mTOR/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2019Article
- Efficacy of first-line erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing dose reduction and those with a low body surface area: A population-based observational study by the Ibaraki Thoracic Integrative (POSITIVE) Research Group.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2016Article
- Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing dose reduction and those with a low body surface area.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2014Article
- Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of combined valproic acid/doxorubicin treatment in dogs with spontaneous cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2010Article
- Pediatric phase I trial design using maximum target inhibition as the primary endpoint.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2010Article
- Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2010Article
- Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: a unified approach.Biometrics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently a large number of new anticancer agents targeting specifically one or more of the extracellular, transmembrane, or intracellular (but extranuclear) processes involved in malignant transformation of cells or carcinogenesis have been developed. These agents show target specificity, predominantly resulting in growth inhibition in tumor models and less frequently in tumor regression, acting in a cytostatic rather than a cytotoxic way. In addition, based on their specific mechanism of action, these target specific agents are expected to have a more favorable toxicity profile. In exploring new anticancer agents, phase I studies generally focus on toxicity and are primarily designed to describe dose limiting toxicity and to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose recommended for phase II studies. These phase II studies are subsequently performed in small groups of patients using the percentage tumor regression to screen for anticancer efficacy. Due to the anticipated low toxicity profile and the mainly growth inhibiting activity of target specific agents, the design of phase I and II studies involving these agents will have to be adapted in several ways. It is emphasized that, although it is helpful to distinguish cytotoxic from cytostatic anticancer agents, this dichotomy can be a simplification. In this paper, we will discuss important issues that will have to be faced when developing clinical trials with these agents and we will specifically translate this into the already known concepts of trial design exploring cytotoxic and cytostatic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12889742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.