Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12889742›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2003

Clinical trial design for target specific anticancer agents.

Ronald Hoekstra, Jaap Verweij, Ferry A L M Eskens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioactive peptides for anticancer therapies.Biomaterials translational · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of combined valproic acid/doxorubicin treatment in dogs with spontaneous cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2010
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald HoekstraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. R.Hoekstra.1@erasmusmc.nl
Jaap Verweij
Ferry A L M Eskens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently a large number of new anticancer agents targeting specifically one or more of the extracellular, transmembrane, or intracellular (but extranuclear) processes involved in malignant transformation of cells or carcinogenesis have been developed. These agents show target specificity, predominantly resulting in growth inhibition in tumor models and less frequently in tumor regression, acting in a cytostatic rather than a cytotoxic way. In addition, based on their specific mechanism of action, these target specific agents are expected to have a more favorable toxicity profile. In exploring new anticancer agents, phase I studies generally focus on toxicity and are primarily designed to describe dose limiting toxicity and to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose recommended for phase II studies. These phase II studies are subsequently performed in small groups of patients using the percentage tumor regression to screen for anticancer efficacy. Due to the anticipated low toxicity profile and the mainly growth inhibiting activity of target specific agents, the design of phase I and II studies involving these agents will have to be adapted in several ways. It is emphasized that, although it is helpful to distinguish cytotoxic from cytostatic anticancer agents, this dichotomy can be a simplification. In this paper, we will discuss important issues that will have to be faced when developing clinical trials with these agents and we will specifically translate this into the already known concepts of trial design exploring cytotoxic and cytostatic agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.