ReviewInvestigational new drugs2003
Noninvasive methods to study drug distribution.
Review in Investigational new drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance of relating efficacy measures to unbound drug concentrations for anti-infective agents.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013Review
- N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: from neurodiagnostics to neurobiology.Progress in neurobiology · 2007Review
- Microdialysis versus other techniques for the clinical assessment of in vivo tissue drug distribution.The AAPS journal · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are two techniques that allow the noninvasive monitoring of drug distribution in living systems (humans, animals), and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides noninvasive physiological information relevant for drug distribution. PET yields series of cross-sectional images that can be used to monitor the absolute radioactivity concentrations in tissues pixel-by-pixel, but does not allow direct identification of each of the products present. MRS produces spectra showing changes in the concentration of both the parent drug and of the metabolites separately for a sensitive volume, but does not provide a simple means for measuring absolute concentrations. dMRI, which measures the changes in the rates of relaxation of water, proportional to the concentrations of the contrast agent (usually Gd-DTPA), readily allows the determination of functional changes in cross-sectional images down to a pixel-by-pixel level. All of these methods are of special interest to evaluate the amounts of drug that can reach the target tissue, penetrate it, remain present at such targets for a sufficient length of time, and how they are metabolized at the target site. Such information may be of particular interest in the study of solid malignant tumors and may become very relevant for determining better treatment strategies. This article presents examples of successful studies of tissue pharmacokinetics with MRS and dMRI. The following article is devoted to PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12889737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.