Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12889737›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2003

Noninvasive methods to study drug distribution.

Ruediger E Port, Walter Wolf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruediger E PortGerman Cancer Research Center, E120, D-69009 Heidelberg, Germany. r.port@dkfz.de
Walter Wolf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are two techniques that allow the noninvasive monitoring of drug distribution in living systems (humans, animals), and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides noninvasive physiological information relevant for drug distribution. PET yields series of cross-sectional images that can be used to monitor the absolute radioactivity concentrations in tissues pixel-by-pixel, but does not allow direct identification of each of the products present. MRS produces spectra showing changes in the concentration of both the parent drug and of the metabolites separately for a sensitive volume, but does not provide a simple means for measuring absolute concentrations. dMRI, which measures the changes in the rates of relaxation of water, proportional to the concentrations of the contrast agent (usually Gd-DTPA), readily allows the determination of functional changes in cross-sectional images down to a pixel-by-pixel level. All of these methods are of special interest to evaluate the amounts of drug that can reach the target tissue, penetrate it, remain present at such targets for a sufficient length of time, and how they are metabolized at the target site. Such information may be of particular interest in the study of solid malignant tumors and may become very relevant for determining better treatment strategies. This article presents examples of successful studies of tissue pharmacokinetics with MRS and dMRI. The following article is devoted to PET.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDiagnostic ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyTissue DistributionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.