ArticleBiophysical journal2003
The role of small intraprotein cavities in the catalytic cycle of bacteriorhodopsin.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Coupling of Tyrosine 185 with the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle, as Revealed by Chemical Shifts, Assisted AF-QM/MM Calculations and Molecular Dynamic Simulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Deprotonation of D96 in bacteriorhodopsin opens the proton uptake pathway.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2013Article
- Allosteric effects of external K+ ions mediated by the aspartate of the GYGD signature sequence in the Kv2.1 K+ channel.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2006Article
- Influence of the water structure on the acetylcholinesterase efficiency.Biophysical journal · 2005Article
- How environment supports a state: molecular dynamics simulations of two states in bacteriorhodopsin suggest lipid and water compensation.Biophysical journal · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last phase of the proton transfer cycle of bacteriorhodopsin calls for a passage of a proton from D38 to D96. This reaction utilizes a narrow shaft approximately 10-A long that connects the two carboxylates that cross through a very hydrophobic domain. As the shaft is too narrow to be permanently hydrated, there are two alternatives for the proton propagation into the channel. The proton may propagate through the shaft without solvation at the expense of a high electrostatic barrier; alternatively, the shaft will expand to accommodate some water molecules, thus lowering the Born energy for the insertion of the charge into the protein (B. Schätzler, N. A. Dencher, J. Tittor, D. Oesterhelt, S. Yaniv-Checover, E. Nachliel, and G. Gutman, 2003, BIOPHYS: J. 84:671-686). A comparative study of nine published crystal-structures of bacteriorhodopsin identified, next to the shaft, microcavities in the protein whose position and surrounding atoms are common to the reported structures. Some of the cavities either shrink or expand during the photocycle. It is argued that the plasticity of the cavities provides a working space needed for the transient solvation of the shaft, thus reducing the activation energy necessary for the solvation of the shaft. This suggestion is corroborated by the recent observations of Klink et al. (B. U. Klink, R. Winter, M. Engelhard, and I. Chizhov, 2002, BIOPHYS: J. 83:3490-3498) that the late phases of the photocycle (tau >/=1 ms) are strongly inhibited by external pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.