ArticleHuman genetics2003
A novel method for automatic genotyping of microsatellite markers based on parametric pattern recognition.
Article in Human genetics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Application of a SSR-GBS marker system on investigation of European Hedgehog species and their hybrid zone dynamics.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Extended haplotypes in the growth hormone releasing hormone receptor gene (GHRHR) are associated with normal variation in height.PloS one · 2009Article
- Does kin selection influence fostering behaviour in Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2005Article
- Linkage disequilibrium between microsatellite markers in the Swedish Sami relative to a worldwide selection of populations.Human genetics · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic mapping of loci affecting complex phenotypes in human and other organisms is presently being conducted on a very large scale, using either microsatellite or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and by partly automated methods. A critical step in this process is the conversion of the instrument output into genotypes, both a time-consuming and error prone procedure. Errors made during this calling of genotypes will dramatically reduce the ability to map the location of loci underlying a phenotype. Accurate methods for automatic genotype calling are therefore important. Here, we describe novel algorithms for automatic calling of microsatellite genotypes using parametric pattern recognition. The analysis of microsatellite data is complicated both by the occurrence of stutter bands, which arise from Taq polymerase misreading the number of repeats, and additional bands derived form the non-template dependent addition of a nucleotide to the 3' end of the PCR products. These problems, together with the fact that the lengths of two alleles in a heterozygous individual may differ by only two nucleotides, complicate the development of an automated process. The novel algorithms markedly reduce the need for manual editing and the frequency of miscalls, and compares very favourably with commercially available software for automatic microsatellite genotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12883999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.