Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12883562›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2003

Benchmarking information needs and use in the Tennessee public health community.

Patricia Lee, Nunzia B Giuse, Nila A Sathe

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developing an evidence-based public health informatics course.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Findings from an organizational network analysis to support local public health management.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Increasing state public health professionals' proficiency in using PubMed.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Public health informatics training in New Mexico.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Information-seeking behavior of faculty in one school of public health.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Complementary competencies: public health and health sciences librarianship.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2005
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Proposing a marriage of academe and public health.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia LeeThe Annette and Irwin Eskind Biomedical Library Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA. patricia.lee@vanderbilt.edu
Nunzia B Giuse
Nila A Sathe

Funding

NATIONAL NETWORK OF LIBRARIES OF MEDICINE (NNLM)N01LM063522 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEISE, FRIEDA O. · 1996 to 2000
$713k
NLM NIH HHS N01-LM-6-3522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective is to provide insight to understanding public health officials' needs and promote access to data repositories and communication tools.

methodsSurvey questions were identified by a focus group with members drawn from the fields of librarianship, public health, and informatics. The resulting comprehensive information needs survey, organized in five distinct broad categories, was distributed to 775 Tennessee public health workers from ninety-five counties in 1999 as part of the National Library of Medicine-funded Partners in Information Access contract.

resultsThe assessment pooled responses from 571 public health workers (73% return rate) representing seventy-two of ninety-five counties (53.4% urban and 46.6% rural) about their information-seeking behaviors, frequency of resources used, computer skills, and level of Internet access. Sixty-four percent of urban and 43% of rural respondents had email access at work and more than 50% of both urban and rural respondents had email at home (N = 289). Approximately 70% of urban and 78% of rural public health officials never or seldom used or needed the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Website. Frequency data pooled from eleven job categories representing a subgroup of 232 health care professionals showed 72% never or seldom used or needed MEDLINE. Electronic resources used daily or weekly were email, Internet search engines, internal databases and mailing lists, and the Tennessee Department of Health Website.

conclusionsWhile, due to the small sample size, data cannot be generalized to the larger population, a clear trend of significant barriers to computer and Internet access can be identified across the public health community. This contributes to an overall limited use of existing electronic resources that inhibits evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersBenchmarkingEducational StatusFemaleFocus GroupsForecastingHealth Care SurveysHealth Planning SupportHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentOnline SystemsPublic Health InformaticsPublic Health PracticeRural Health ServicesTennessee

Identifiers

PMID12883562
PMCPMC164395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.