Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12882360›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2002

Genetic targeting of cerebellar Purkinje cells: history, current status and novel strategies.

Jaroslaw J Barski, Matthias Lauth, Michael Meyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The principle of recursive genome function.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2008
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaroslaw J BarskiMax-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology, Department of Neurobiochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. barski@neuro.mpg.de
Matthias Lauth
Michael Meyer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is an account of developments in the field of transgenic and gene targeting approaches with special emphasis on the cerebellar Purkinje cell. A critical discussion of the available genetic tools is provided. As genetic engineering of the mouse is still a rapidly moving field, we felt it appropriate to include some ideas on novel strategies for refined genetic manipulations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGene DeletionGene TargetingHumansPurkinje CellsRecombination, GeneticRecovery of FunctionTransgenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.