Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12881641›Full record

ArticleVirus genes2002

Molecular anatomy of Chilo iridescent virus genome and the evolution of viral genes.

Nurith J Jakob, Gholamreza Darai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virus genes, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nurith J JakobInstitut für Medizinische Virologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Gholamreza Darai
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chilo iridescent virus (CIV) or Insect iridescent virus 6 (IIV-6) is the type species of the genus iridovirus, a member of the Iridoviridae family. CIV is highly pathogenic for a variety of insect larvae and this implicates a possible use as a biological insecticide. CIV progeny and assembly occur in the cytoplasm of the infected cell and accumulate in the fatbody of the infected insects. Since the discovery of CIV in 1966, many attempts were made to elucidate the viral genome structure and the amino acid sequences of different viral gene products. The elucidation of the coding capacity and strategy of CIV was the first step towards understanding the underlying mechanisms of viral infection, replication and virus-host interaction. The virions contain a single linear ds DNA molecule that is circularly permuted and terminally redundant. The coding capacity of the CIV genome was determined by the analysis of the complete DNA nucleotide sequence consisting of 212,482 bp that represent 468 open reading frames encoding for polypeptides ranging from 40 to 2432 amino acid residues. The analysis of the coding capacity of the CIV genome revealed that 50% (234 ORFs) of all identified ORFs (468 ORFs) were non-overlapping. The identification of several putative viral gene products including a DNA ligase and a viral antibiotic peptide is a powerful tool for the investigation of the phylogenetic relatedness of this evolutionary and ecologically relevant eukaryotic virus.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsDNA LigasesInsectaIridoviridaeLarvaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyProtein Sorting SignalsTerminology as TopicViral ProteinsDNA LigasesProtein Sorting SignalsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12881641
OpenAlexW1576518964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.