Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12879868›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2003

Interaction between excitatory and inhibitory metabotropic pathways in the guinea-pig antrum.

N Teramoto, G D S Hirst

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N TeramotoDepartment of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
G D S Hirst
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular recordings were made from isolated bundles of the circular muscle layer of guinea-pig gastric antrum and the responses evoked by stimulating nitrergic nerve fibres were examined. Nitrergic inhibitory junction potentials (nitrergic-IJPs), evoked by trains of stimuli, had small amplitudes and were associated with a reduction in the rate of occurrence and amplitude of spontaneously occurring depolarizing potentials, termed unitary potentials. Nitrergic-IJPs were abolished either by membrane hyperpolarization or by 4, 4'-diisothiocyano-2, 2'-stilbene disulfonic acid (DIDS); both of these abolished the discharge of unitary potentials. Membrane depolarization increased the rate of discharge of unitary potentials so that they summed to give rise to are generative potential. Nitrergic nerve stimulation abolished regenerative potentials; this inhibition did not result from a change in threshold for the initiation of regenerative potentials,rather it occurred at some stage after the gating process. Inhibitory nitrergic nerve responses were blocked by L-nitroarginine (NOLA) and oxadiazolo quinoxalin-l-one (ODQ), an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase. The observations suggest that the inhibition of regenerative potentials results from an interaction between an inhibitory and an excitatory metabotropic pathway.

Indexed as

4,4'-Diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-Disulfonic AcidAnimalsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleGuinea PigsMaleMuscle, SmoothNeural InhibitionNitratesNitroarginineOxadiazolesPyloric AntrumQuinoxalinesSynaptic Transmission1H-(1,2,4)oxadiazolo(4,3-a)quinoxalin-1-one4,4'-Diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-Disulfonic AcidEnzyme InhibitorsNitratesNitroarginineOxadiazolesQuinoxalines

Identifiers

PMID12879868
PMCPMC2343004
OpenAlexW1988336091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.