How to change clinical behaviour: no answers yet.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
   Trial
2. The effect of professional-led guideline workshops on clinical practice for the management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates in Japan: a controlled before-and-after study.Implementation science : IS · 2015
   Article
3. Perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of a new system for treating back pain: a qualitative interview study.BMC medicine · 2011
   Article
4. Barriers in recognising, diagnosing and managing depressive and anxiety disorders as experienced by Family Physicians; a focus group study.BMC family practice · 2009
   Article
5. Prescribing antibiotics for respiratory tract infections by GPs: management and prescriber characteristics.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
   Article
6. Community nursing needs more silver surfers: a questionnaire survey of primary care nurses' use of information technology.BMC nursing · 2004
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Randomised controlled trial of the impact of guidelines, prioritized review criteria and feedback on implementation of recommendations for angina and asthma.2003
• Commented on by
  Is the quality of care in general medical practice improving? Results of a longitudinal observational study.2003
• Commented on by
  Changing clinical behaviour.2003

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as