Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12879633›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2003

[Clinico-pharmacologic explanation models of cerivastatin associated rhabdomyolysis].

Markus Zeitlinger, Markus Müller

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus ZeitlingerUniversitätsklinik für Klinische Pharmakologie, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Wien.
Markus Müller
Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of fatal cases of rhabdomyolysis the HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitor cerivastatin had to be withdrawn from the global market in 2001. The high frequency and severity of cerivastatin-associated rhabdomyolysis caused concerns about the safety of the entire class of HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins). Still, the frequency of deadly incidents of rhabdomyolysis with cerivastatin was 16 to 80 times higher than with other statins. This seems to be due to a combination of several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of cerivastatin. Cerivastatin shows the highest oral bioavailability within its class. Interactions with other drugs like gemfibrocil may cause further elevation of cerivastatin plasma levels, thereby leading to higher frequencies of side effects in peripheral organs. With approximately 1 pM cerivastatin shows the lowest IC50 for inhibition of HMG-CoA-reductase of all statins. The combination of high systemic drug levels and high intrinsic activity potentially leads to apoptosis and energy-depletion of skeletal-muscle cells. Therefore cerivastatin-associated fatal rhabdomyolysis seems to be based on specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of cerivastatin, and is not a general characteristic of all members of this drug-class. The experiences with cerivastatin support the importance of clinical studies even about well established drugs, and underline the relevance of precise reporting of adverse events by each physician.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticholesteremic AgentsBiological AvailabilityCause of DeathDrug InteractionsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyridinesRhabdomyolysisRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisAnticholesteremic AgentscerivastatinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyridines

Identifiers

PMID12879633
OpenAlexW2095549405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.