Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12879312›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2004

The membrane-binding properties of a class A amphipathic peptide.

H Mozsolits, T-H Lee, A H A Clayton, W H Sawyer, M-I Aguilar

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein Amphipathic Helix Insertion: A Mechanism to Induce Membrane Fission.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Biomimetic silica microspheres in biosensing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H MozsolitsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, 3800 Clayton, Vic, Australia.
T-H Lee
A H A Clayton
W H Sawyer
M-I Aguilar
Monash University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The membrane-binding properties of a class A amphipathic peptide (18D) were investigated using two different immobilized model membrane systems. The first system involved the use of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to study the binding of 18D to dimyristylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) and dimyristylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), which allowed peptide binding to be monitored in real time. The SPR experiments indicated stronger binding of 18D to DMPG than DMPC, which kinetic analysis revealed was due to a faster on-rate. The second model membrane system involved immobilized membrane chromatography in which the binding of 18D to either DMPC or DMPG monolayers covalently linked to silica particles was analysed by elution chromatography. Stronger binding affinity of 18D was also obtained with the negatively charged phosphatidylglycerol (PG) monolayer compared to the phosphatidylcholine (PC) monolayer, which was consistent with the SPR results. Non-linear binding behaviour of 18D to the immobilized lipid monolayers was also observed, which suggests that the peptide undergoes conformational and orientational changes upon binding to the immobilized PC and PG ligands. Significant band broadening was also observed on both monolayers, with larger bandwidths obtained on the PC surface, indicating slower binding and orientation kinetics with the zwitterionic surface. The dependence of logk' on the percentage of methanol also demonstrated a bimodal interaction whereby hydrophobic forces predominated at higher temperatures and methanol concentrations, while at lower temperatures, electrostatic and other polar forces also made a contribution to the affinity of the peptides for the lipid monolayer particularly. Overall, these results demonstrate the complementary use of these two lipid biosensors which allows the role of hydrophobic and electrostatic forces in peptide-membrane interactions to be studied and insight gained into the kinetic factors associated with these interactions.

Indexed as

Binding SitesBiosensing TechniquesChromatographyDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersLiposomesMembrane FluidityMembrane ProteinsMembranes, ArtificialPeptidesPhosphatidylglycerolsProtein BindingSurface Plasmon ResonanceTemperatureDimyristoylphosphatidylcholinedimyristoylphosphatidylglycerolLipid BilayersLiposomesMembrane ProteinsMembranes, ArtificialPeptidesPhosphatidylglycerols

Identifiers

PMID12879312
OpenAlexW1972927780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.