Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12879256›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2003

AFLP and SSR polymorphism in a Coffea interspecific backcross progeny [( C. heterocalyx x C. canephora) x C. canephora].

I Coulibaly, B Revol, M Noirot, V Poncet, M Lorieux, C Carasco-Lacombe, J Minier, M Dufour, P Hamon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physical mapping of rDNA and heterochromatin in chromosomes of 16 Coffea species: a revised view of species differentiation.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

I CoulibalyIRD, UMR 1097, 911 av Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
B Revol
M Noirot
V Poncet
M Lorieux
C Carasco-Lacombe
J Minier
M Dufour
P Hamon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An interspecific cross (BC 1) involving a species with one of the largest genomes in the Coffea genus [ Coffea heterocalyx (HET), qDNA = 1.74 pg] and a species with a medium-sized genome [ Coffea canephora (CAN), qDNA = 1.43 pg] was studied using two types of molecular markers, AFLP and SSR. One hundred and eighty eight AFLP bands and 34 SSR primer pairs were suitable for mapping. The total map length was 1,360 cM with 190 loci distributed in 15 linkage groups. The results were compared to those obtained previously on an interspecific BC 1 progeny involving a species with a medium-sized genome ( Coffea liberica var dewevrei, DEW) and a species with one of the smallest genomes ( Coffea pseudozanguebariae, PSE). They are discussed relative to three main points: (1) the relevance of the different marker types, (2) the genomic distribution of AFLP and SSR markers, and (3) the relation between AFLP polymorphism and genome size.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidChromosomes, PlantCoffeaEvolution, MolecularGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantInbreedingMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence DataGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.